20

Definition

.

Category that brings together a set of initiatives, practices or types of interventions that share the same strategic focus ("what" they intend to do and/or problems they intend to solve or mitigate) and the same forms of action and approach ("how" they intend to address problems and advance their purposes).

92

Evaluated cases

Definition

These are examples of practical application of each type of solution included in the platform. They correspond, in general, to specific initiatives or programs through which a set of activities are implemented, developed and executed in an articulated manner, seeking to mobilize a set of resources (physical, human, financial or technological) in favor of the realization of a common objective and purpose and the achievement of a set of clearly identified and specified results.

9

Effective cases

Definition

.

The classification of a case as "effective" means that there is consistent and robust evidence (i.e., assessed by research using Maryland Scale Level 5 methodology) that the implementation of the program/initiative contemplated in that case generated a positive impact on the intended and evaluated outcome variables ("outcomes").

Criminal Justice

Activate the filters and/or select one of the solution types below to view details of existing evidence and examine practical application cases.

Redirection of Hard Drug Abuse Offenders

Mixed Evidence

.

.

.

.

.

Mixed Evidence
Evidence: Has been effective to reduce hard drug use, but there is no conclusive evidence regarding the impact on recidivism.

Has been effective to reduce hard drug use, but there is no conclusive evidence regarding the impact on recidivism.

DUI Treatment Court

Mixed Evidence

.

.

.

.

.

Mixed Evidence
Evidence: There is no conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of these courts, although there are promising indications.

There is no conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of these courts, although there are promising indications.

Specialized Mental Health Courts

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising
Evidence: Has produced positive effects in terms of reducing criminal recidivism by people with psychiatric illnesses.

Has produced positive effects in terms of reducing criminal recidivism by people with psychiatric illnesses.

Restorative Justice

Effective

.

.

.

.

.

Effective
Evidence: Has reduced recidivism in violent crimes and increased victim satisfaction, although the evidence is mixed for child abuse.

Has reduced recidivism in violent crimes and increased victim satisfaction, although the evidence is mixed for child abuse.

Restorative Justice: Youth

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising
Evidence: The Crime Solutions platform evaluated the impact of 110 Restorative Justice programs aimed at young people. This type of…

The Crime Solutions platform evaluated the impact of 110 Restorative Justice programs aimed at young people. This type of intervention was classified as promising in terms of reducing recidivism, and it was considered to increase the perception of justice by victims while favoring “restoration” and reparation by young offenders [1][2][3].

Electronic Monitoring of Offenders

Mixed Evidence

.

.

.

.

.

Mixed Evidence
Evidence: The evidence varies depending on how recidivism rates are calculated. In addition, it has not worked with moderate/severe offenders…

The evidence varies depending on how recidivism rates are calculated. In addition, it has not worked with moderate/severe offenders, but has worked with sex offenders.

Alternative Measures

Mixed Evidence

.

.

.

.

.

Mixed Evidence
Evidence: The evidence is inconclusive. The small number of high quality studies precludes a more assertive understanding and measurement of…

The evidence is inconclusive. The small number of high quality studies precludes a more assertive understanding and measurement of the impact of Alternative Measures on recidivism.

Alternative Measures: Youth

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising
Evidence: When applied before sentencing, they have worked, especially for primary offenders; after sentencing, they work for female offenders…

When applied before sentencing, they have worked, especially for primary offenders; after sentencing, they work for female offenders.

Some types of solutions were not included in the Evidence Bank due to the absence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have evaluated them, or due to weaknesses identified in existing evaluations. Click here to see the list of types identified but not included in the Evidence Bank.

Search for types of solutions or evaluated cases

Enter keywords and use the filters to find the most relevant evidence for your area of expertise/interest

Community of Practice

Connect with sectoral leaders, participate in initiatives and discussions, and access news, techniques and tools relevant to evidence-based policymaking.

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us