Problems addressed

Effectiveness

Mixed Evidence

.

.

.

.

.

Mixed Evidence

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Religious programs in prisons should not be confused with worship practices, reading of documents considered sacred, or other rituals performed within the prison system. They are structured programs, which in most cases use cognitive behavioral therapy practices and professional training courses with qualified professionals, and also include elements of religious faith in their programming.

Country of application
  • United States
Evidence

A systematic review located four impact evaluations of a faith-based prison program (“Prison Fellowship”). All four studies included reported promising results in terms of the potential impact on recidivism reduction (re-detainments and/or re-arrests). Three of those studies found statistically significant effects on recidivism reduction, and one found no overall effects, but found that program involvement was an important moderator of the observed effects (the most active inmates in the Bible study groups were significantly less likely to recidivate in the one-year follow-up period) [1].
The Crime Solutions platform presents the results of a meta-analysis that evaluated the impact of 15 religious programs in prison. This practice is considered to have no effect in terms of reducing institutional misconduct and is ineffective to reduce antisocial attitudes [2]. There are no studies on this topic in the Crime Reduction Toolkit platform.

Bibliography

[1] Johnson, B. R., Tompkins, R. B. y Webb, D. (2008). Objective Hope: Assessing the Effectiveness of Faith-Based Organizations. A Review of the Literature. Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion. https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/24809.pdf

[2] Schaefer, L., Sams, T. y Lux, J. (2016). Saved, Salvaged, or Sunk. The Prison Journal, 96(4), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516650883

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us