Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Motivational Interviewing (motivational therapy or motivational interviewing therapy) may be described as an approach that promotes change and is suitable for use in a prison or community supervision setting with involuntary “clients”.
One of the goals of Motivational Interviewing is to avoid resistance to change, as the more the inmate resists, the less likely they are to change and the more likely they are to drop out of the intervention [1]. This is because this approach considers that, when targeting individuals who are resistant to change and deny having a problem and the need to change any aspect of their being or behavior, strategies and programs can fail, even in cases where practitioners have highly specialized intervention skills and/or work with well-defined and validated intervention formats.

Country of application
  • United Kingdom
Evidence

A systematic review identified 13 published studies and six dissertation abstracts evaluating Motivational Interviewing in relation to the intervention with substance-using offenders, domestic violence perpetrators, drunk drivers, and general offenders [2]. Motivational Interviewing has helped to increase retention and commitment to treatment, and has contributed to an improved motivation to change. However, changes in motivation do not always lead to changes in behavior. The evidence is mixed regarding the impact on the commission of new crimes (with positive effects on general crime, mixed results on drunk driving, and no effect on domestic violence).
The Crime Reduction Toolkit platform considered Motivational Interviewing with domestic violence perpetrators based on a systematic review of seven studies, using victim-reported measures and official recidivism measures. Overall, the evidence suggests that Motivational Interviewing reduces recidivism rates. The intervention encouraged domestic violence offenders to change their behavior. However, the review is only based on a small number of studies, and more research is needed to understand the conditions under which the intervention works best [3]. Programs with a more empathic than confrontational approach appear to be more effective [3] [4].

Bibliography

[1] Miller, W. R., Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for change (2nd Edition). The Guilford Press. https://bluepeteraustralia.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/motivational-int…

[2] McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X278326

[3] Vigurs, C., Schucan-Bird, K., Quy, K. y Gough, D. (2015). A Systematic Review of Motivational Approaches as a Pre-treatment Intervention for Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes (What Works: Crime Reduction Systematic Review Series núm. 4). London, England. Social Science Research Unit (SSRU) [UCL-Institute of Education]. https://whatworks.college.police.uk/Research/Systematic_Review_Series/D…

[4] Gleicher, L. y Green, E. (2020). Effective Strategies in Community Supervision: Core Correctional Practices and Motivational Interviewing. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/effective-strategies-in…

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us