Axis
Problems addressed

Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

There are two interrogation methods: information gathering and accusatory. Information gathering is used in the UK, New Zealand, Australia, and Western Europe, and is characterized by report production, truth-seeking, and active listening. The accusatory approach is used mainly in the United States and Canada, and focuses on accusation, confrontation, psychological manipulation, and rejection of denials.
The interrogation of suspects is very important to ensure conviction of the guilty and release of the innocent. However, police interrogations can result in false confessions, as has been documented in several countries.
It should be noted, however, that police interrogation is banned in several Latin American countries, although it continues to be a technique applied in the context of investigative and judicial police functions.

Country of application
  • United States
  • United Kingdom
Evidence

The results of the systematic review with two meta-analyses produced by the Campbell Collaboration (based on five field studies and 12 experimental studies) indicate that both the accusatory and the information-gathering methods are effective to obtain confessions, regardless of the status of innocent or guilty suspects [1].
In experimental contexts, the results indicate that both methods increase the chances of obtaining a true confession from a guilty participant. However, the results of the control group indicate that the accusatory method increases the likelihood of inducing innocent participants to confess. The information-gathering method, on the other hand, reduces the chance of obtaining false confessions.

Bibliography

[1] Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.13

Information Source

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us