Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Community activism programs aim to transform attitudes, behaviors, and social and gender norms that have an impact on unequal power relations between men and women. Their target audience is the general population, not just victims and aggressors, or potential victims and aggressors.
In general, these programs work through selected and trained community activists. The activists work with the support of volunteers and use structured materials to guide their engagement with men and women in the community through dialogues and activities that challenge their gender perspectives and their attitude and behaviors toward violence against women. They also often work with community leaders, religious leaders, local authorities, and other actors who may be influential at the community level. Other services, such as healthcare and security, are also often engaged, so that the system of responses to violence against women and girls can be strengthened and the attitude of those agents transformed.
To be effective, this type of intervention must have a medium- or long-term duration (2-3 years), as well as intensive and constant engagement. It is also necessary to consider the local context and adapt the proposed activities accordingly.

Country of application
  • Uganda
  • Ghana
Evidence

Of eight experimental or quasi-experimental studies identified and analyzed by the What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls Global program, only three reported positive impacts and five reported no impact on violence against women and girls. All the interventions evaluated were implemented in Africa.
An evaluation of the SHARE (Safe Homes and Respect for Everyone) program in Uganda showed the most conclusive and positive results. Three years after the start of the program, there was a 20% reduction in reports filed by women of physical and sexual violence perpetrated by an intimate partner. Reports of aggression by men, however, remained unchanged.
A quasi-experimental study of the Gender Centre’s Rural Response System (RRS) program in Ghana – also known as COMBAT – showed a significant reduction in cases of sexual violence after 18 months of implementation and a non-significant reduction in physical violence. There was also no reduction in men committing intimate partner violence.
An impact evaluation five years after the implementation of the SASA! community mobilization program in Uganda associated the intervention with significantly less acceptance of partner violence among women and men, as well as a considerable reduction in experiences of physical and sexual violence. It also increased the likelihood of women who were victims of violence in the community seeking help. There were also fewer reports of sexual violence committed by men in the communities that received the project, compared to other control communities.
According to the authors, these behavior-changing interventions are complex and require time and intensity. In addition, the successful cases have a well-defined structure, with a clear theory of change; they work with groups within the community, not just with individuals; they use participatory methods that allow for greater critical reflection on the part of the members; they use high-quality manuals developed in partnership with the community; they also involve women or couples with a history of violence; and they have a rigorous selection of activists and volunteers [1].

Bibliography

[1] Kerr-Wilson, A., Gibbs, A., McAslan, E., Ramsoomar, L., Parke, A., Khuwaja, H. Jewkes, R. (2020). What works to prevent violence against women and girls? A rigurous global evidence review of interventions to prevent violence against women and girls. What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls Global Programme. https://www.whatworks.co.za/documents/publications/374-evidence-reviewf…

Information Source

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us