Definition
.Category that brings together a set of initiatives, practices or types of interventions that share the same strategic focus ("what" they intend to do and/or problems they intend to solve or mitigate) and the same forms of action and approach ("how" they intend to address problems and advance their purposes).
152
Evaluated cases
Definition
These are examples of practical application of each type of solution included in the platform. They correspond, in general, to specific initiatives or programs through which a set of activities are implemented, developed and executed in an articulated manner, seeking to mobilize a set of resources (physical, human, financial or technological) in favor of the realization of a common objective and purpose and the achievement of a set of clearly identified and specified results.
13
Effective cases
Definition
.The classification of a case as "effective" means that there is consistent and robust evidence (i.e., assessed by research using Maryland Scale Level 5 methodology) that the implementation of the program/initiative contemplated in that case generated a positive impact on the intended and evaluated outcome variables ("outcomes").
Activate the filters and/or select one of the solution types below to view details of existing evidence and examine practical application cases.
Specialized Mental Health Courts
Promising
.
.
.
.
.
Has produced positive effects in terms of reducing criminal recidivism by people with psychiatric illnesses.
Education, Training, and Employment Interventions
Promising
.
.
.
.
.
Has reduced recidivism and improved graduate employability.
Addiction Treatment and Relapse Prevention Programs
Mixed Evidence
.
.
.
.
.
Therapeutic communities have reduced criminal recidivism and relapse to drug use among adults, but not among youth.
Social Integration Promotion-Based Programs
Mixed Evidence
.
.
.
.
.
Have reduced recidivism overall. However, there is mixed evidence for some specific modalities.
Electronic Monitoring of Offenders
Mixed Evidence
.
.
.
.
.
The evidence varies depending on how recidivism rates are calculated. In addition, it has not worked with moderate/severe offenders, but has worked with sex offenders.
Alternative Measures
Mixed Evidence
.
.
.
.
.
The evidence is inconclusive. The small number of high quality studies precludes a more assertive understanding and measurement of the impact of Alternative Measures on recidivism.
Alternative Measures: Youth
Promising
.
.
.
.
.
When applied before sentencing, they have worked, especially for primary offenders; after sentencing, they work for female offenders.
Sentence Supervision
No Effect
.
.
.
.
.
The main and most robust piece of evidence indicates that there is no effect on criminal recidivism.
Temporary Release and Parole
Mixed Evidence
.
.
.
.
.
The evidence varies by modality, but is promising with regard to its application in combination with other reinsertion techniques.
Some types of solutions were not included in the Evidence Bank due to the absence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have evaluated them, or due to weaknesses identified in existing evaluations. Click here to see the list of types identified but not included in the Evidence Bank.
Search for types of solutions or evaluated cases
Enter keywords and use the filters to find the most relevant evidence for your area of expertise/interest
Community of Practice
Connect with sectoral leaders, participate in initiatives and discussions, and access news, techniques and tools relevant to evidence-based policymaking.
Send us your study!
Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!
Contact us