Axis

Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

DUI Policing increases the perception and real risk of the police identifying and arresting drivers who are driving under the influence of alcohol.
There are two ways of policing drivers under the influence of alcohol: sobriety checkpoints and police patrols.
Checkpoints are police operations in public spaces aimed at reducing the number of alcohol-related car accidents. At checkpoints, police officers stop drivers to assess their blood alcohol content using behavioral, physiological, or chemical tests. Two types of approach and breathalyzer testing can be carried out at checkpoints: random testing, which involves stopping and checking drivers indiscriminately, and selective testing, in which drivers suspected of drinking and driving are stopped and checked.
In the case of the second inspection alternative, police patrols on the streets seek to identify drivers with suspicious behavior, who are approached for verification.

Country of application
  • Australia
  • United States
Evidence

The Crime Solutions platform presents a meta-analysis of 40 studies that identified that sobriety checkpoints have a significant effect in terms of reducing the number of vehicle collisions. The researchers point to an overall 13% reduction in the number of accidents in locations that have implemented sobriety checkpoints [1].
The Crime Reduction Toolkit platform also cites this work and incorporates two other works, one with 15 studies and another with 23 studies. The first meta-analysis found positive effects of police programs based on the installation of breathalyzer checkpoints on deaths in accidents related to drunk driving. An average reduction of 8.9% in alcohol-related accidents was observed [2]. Similarly, the second meta-analysis found that any contact with checkpoints, whether by approaching them or simply passing through them, reinforces people’s perception of increased police activity and contributes to an increase in the perceived risk of punishment for drunk driving. Through this mechanism, checkpoints can play an important role in preventing alcohol-related accidents and associated injuries [3].
A consolidated evaluation of four independent projects developed with the aim of reducing drunk driving through the use of checkpoints found that this policing model can generate significant reductions in the number of drunk driving deaths when they include: (a) a coordinated statewide effort, (b) the installation of a large number of alcohol checkpoints every weekend throughout the year, (c) intensive publicity of enforcement among the population, and (d) adequate training of enforcement agents [4].
In relation to police patrols on the move, there is insufficient evidence to establish a correlation between increased patrols and a reduction in adverse outcomes associated with drinking and driving [5].

Bibliography

[1] Erke, A., Goldenbeld, C. & Vaa, T. (2009). The effects of drink-driving checkpoints on crashes--a meta-analysis. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 41(5), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.005

[2] Bergen G., Pitan A., Qu S., Shults R., Chattopadhyay S., Elder R., Sleet D., Coleman H., Compton R., Nichols J., Clymer J., Calvert W., and CPSTF: (2014), Publicized Sobriety Checkpoint Programmes: A Community Guide Systematic Review, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46:5; 529-539​. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24745644/

[3] Elder, R. W., Shults, R. A., Sleet, D. A., Nichols, J. L., Zaza, S. & Thompson, R. S. (2002). Effectiveness of Sobriety Checkpoints for Reducing Alcohol-Involved Crashes. Traffic Injury Prevention, 3(4), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580214623

[4] Fell, J. C., Langston, E. A. & Tippetts, A. S. (2005). Evaluation of Four State Impaired Driving Enforcement Demonstration Programs: Georgia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Louisiana (49th Annual Proceedings Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine). Calverton, Maryland. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217456/pdf/aam49_p311.pdf

[5] Goss, C. W., van Bramer, L. D., Gliner, J. A., Porter, T. R., Roberts, I. G. & Diguiseppi, C. (2008). Increased police patrols for preventing alcohol-impaired driving. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(4), CD005242. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005242.pub2

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us