Description

This type of intervention encompasses prevention programs aimed at reducing perpetration and avoiding victimization in episodes of sexual violence, with particular attention to adolescent and young adult women (especially those aged 11 to 26), given the disproportionate victimization of those population groups in this type of crime.
These programs are aimed at preventing the occurrence of sexual violence, as well as trying to foster actions of solidarity toward the victims while rejecting all types of violent behavior, are usually carried out in school, university, or community settings, and encompass a series of universal-level programs designed to:
1) Provide children with information about inappropriate touching, ways to identify abusive situations, and how to tell a trusted adult about the incident;
2) Increase adolescents’ and young adults’ knowledge of dating/partner violence;
3) Develop students’ protective skills to avoid unsafe situations;
4) Promote willingness to disclose sexual abuse incidents;
5) Change the attitude or beliefs that support intimate partner violence;
6) Increase adolescents’ and young adults’ empathy for victims;
7) Improve conflict management skills; and
8) Encourage peer support and act as natural guardians in those spaces, training them to identify and act in risky situations (“bystanders”).
In the case of child sexual abuse, the focus is on sharing information about appropriate or inappropriate touching, ways to identify abusive situations, how to refuse inappropriate touching or leave abusive situations, and how to tell an adult or trusted person about the incident.

Country of application
  • Canada
  • United States
  • Kenia
  • South Africa
Evidence

The Crime Solutions platform includes studies that demonstrate that interventions to reduce sexual violence among young couples increase the participants’ knowledge of relevant information [1][2].
One of the reviews used by Crime Solutions was reviewed and published by the Campbell Collaboration. According to this review, focused on school-based interventions, these programs improve young people’s knowledge of abusive/violent relationships, promote attitudes that reduce young people’s acceptance of dating violence, and increase their awareness of appropriate conflict resolution attitudes. However, this same systematic review indicates that these programs have little impact on behavioral change and therefore do not substantially affect perpetration and/or victimization in episodes of dating violence. No statistically significant effects were recorded for either of these variables (perpetration and victimization) when the results were measured immediately after the intervention (post-test), and, when measured after a follow-up period, only positive effects on perpetration, but not on victimization, were observed [1].
Sexual assault education programs implemented on college campi improve the attitude toward violence, such as non-acceptance of rape, reduction of sex-role stereotypes, promotion of a more positive attitude toward women, and mitigation of feelings of shame for having been a victim of this type of violence [3].
In the case of programs that focus specifically on children, benefits have been observed in terms of knowledge and skills related to protective and preventive behaviors [4][5].
In the case of sexual assault prevention programs through the role of bystanders, studies reviewed by Crime Solutions indicate that interventions reinforce the bystanders’ intention to intervene in sexual assault situations [6]. One of the reviews used by Crime Solutions was reviewed and published by the Campbell Collaboration. According to this review, these interventions have beneficial effects on young people’s propensity to take responsibility for intervening/acting in cases of violence, as well as on their knowledge of strategies that can be used to intervene in those cases. However, no evidence of effects on the perpetration of actual sexual assaults has been found [7].
Lastly, Crime Solutions finds that male-focused sexual violence prevention programs are not effective to reduce those crimes, although they do work to reduce men’s intention to be sexually aggressive in the future and to increase men’s intention to participate in prevention efforts in the future (e.g., stopping a potential assault they face) [8].
The Crime Reduction Toolkit platform identified and analyzed three systematic reviews, and notes that there is evidence that educational interventions aimed at preventing youth dating violence contribute to the prevention of this form of violence; however, overall, these interventions did not have a statistically significant effect on its incidence.
Some of the studies analyzed showed a statistically significant decrease in sexual assault victimization and/or physical violence perpetration. However, others did not detect any statistically significant effect on these variables. According to this platform, these interventions can help to reduce those rates by developing skills among young people for effective communication, for dealing constructively with stress, disappointment, and rejection, and for resolving conflicts and promoting healthier relationships [1][2][9].

Bibliography

[1] La Rue, L., Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Pigott, T. D. (2014). School‐based Interventions to Reduce Dating and Sexual Violence: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1–110. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2014.7

[2] Fellmeth, G. L. T., Heffernan, C., Nurse, J., Habibula, S., Sethi, D. (2013). Educational and skills-based interventions for preventing relationship and dating violence in adolescents and young adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(6), CD004534. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004534.pub3

[3] Anderson, L. A., Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual Assault Education Programs: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Their Effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x

[4] Davis, M. K., Gidycz, C. A. (2000). Child sexual abuse prevention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_11

[5] Walsh, K., Zwi, K., Woolfenden, S., Shlonsky, A. (2015). School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(4), CD004380. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004380.pub3

[6] Katz, J., Moore, J. (2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00113

[7] Kettrey, H. H., Marx, R. A., Tanner‐Smith, E. E. (2019). Effects of bystander programs on the prevention of sexual assault among adolescents and college students: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1-2), 548. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2019.1

[8] Wright, L. A., Zounlome, N. O. O., Whiston, S. C. (2018). The Effectiveness of Male-Targeted Sexual Assault Prevention Programs: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 21(5), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018801330

[9] Koker, P., Mathews, C., Zuch, M., Bastien, S., Mason-Jones, A. J. (2014). A systematic review of interventions for preventing adolescent intimate partner violence. The Journal of Adolescent Health : Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 54(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.008

Evaluated cases

Women’s Health CoOp (Pretoria, South Africa)

Abuse Screening

Adolescent Girls Initiative in Kenya

Implementation of Federal Sex-Offender Registry Requirements in 14 States

PREPARE: Program for the Prevention of Risky Sexual Behavior and Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents

Women's Program

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us