Description

This intervention consists of keeping schools open beyond regular school hours, including on weekends, to facilitate children’s and adolescents’ access to activities that complement the school curriculum and contribute to their healthy and comprehensive development. Those actions usually take place in school facilities or community centers, and may include pedagogical reinforcement activities, recreation, sports, social and emotional education workshops, tutoring, among others.
Those programs, in addition to bringing concrete benefits to participating students by improving certain individual skills, are also relevant from a public safety prevention standpoint because they keep students busy during school hours (or school days) when they many times have little supervision at home, as their parents or caregivers are often at work. The goal is to keep children and adolescents away from risky activities.

Country of application
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • United States
Evidence

A systematic review with a meta-analysis identified 17 studies that evaluated the impact of extended school hours programs. The analyses provided by this review indicate that none of those types of intervention is associated with a significant effect on juvenile delinquency as measured by self-reports, police records, and teacher or parent reports of arrests and behavioral incidents [1].
A second systematic review with a meta-analysis, despite not finding any statistically significant impacts on the variables ‘substance use’ and ‘school attendance’, reported positive impacts on the following variables: students’ positive attitude to school (standardized mean difference = 0.34), school bonding (standardized mean difference = 0.14), promotion of positive social behaviors (standardized mean difference = 0.19), externalizing behaviors (standardized mean difference = 0.19), and school performance (standardized mean difference = 0.12). In all cases, the impact was considered small, but statistically significant [2].
A third systematic review with a meta-analysis refined the results related to school performance, insofar as it found specific effects on reading and math skills, on an individual basis. On average, students who participated in this type of program performed slightly (and statistically significantly) better than those who did not (standardized mean differences = 0.07 and 0.16, respectively) [3].
The Crime Solutions platform presents the results of those three meta-analyses and classifies that type of program as promising in the areas of self-perception, school performance, child-school bonding, and positive social behaviors, but as ineffective for reducing delinquency, drug use, and school attendance.

Bibliography

[1] Taheri, S. A. and Welsh, B. C. (2016). After-School Programs for Delinquency Prevention. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(3), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014567542

[2] Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6

[3] Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-School-Time Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 275–313. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002275

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us