Problems addressed

Effectiveness

Effective

.

.

.

.

.

Effective

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Police Youth Redirection Programs comprise a set of strategies that the police can implement as an alternative to prosecuting young people.
Evidence indicates that an adolescent’s first contact with the justice system tends to accelerate and worsen their criminal trajectory. To reduce or at least postpone this first contact, police initiatives have been created with a focus on redirecting young people who have committed low-risk offenses (vandalism, graffiti, or theft) and have not gone through the criminal justice system.
Redirection programs focus on placing young people who have committed minor offenses in social prevention programs rather than introducing them to the criminal justice system and aim to suspend the sanctioning procedure, holding them accountable for their actions and preventing them from repeating illicit behaviors.
The actions and components of those programs can range from low-intensity measures, including a simple verbal reprimand from the police or judge, or some form of bail to highly intensive measures, such as accepting formal admission into a psychological treatment program or other measures that help prevent repetition of the behavior.

Country of application
  • United States
  • United Kingdom
Evidence

The Crime Solutions and Crime Reduction Toolkit platforms present the results of a meta-analysis carried out by the Campbell Collaboration that evaluated the impact of 31 redirection programs implemented between 1979 and 2015 with adolescents aged 10 to 17. This meta-analysis found that redirection programs are effective in reducing future offending behaviors among low-risk youth. The studies included in the meta-analysis point to a modest, but statistically significant, 6% reduction in recidivism for low-risk youth compared to those who were prosecuted by the traditional/standard justice system (control group). This indicates that this type of intervention can be an effective alternative to the formal justice system for young people under the age of 18 who have had little or no prior involvement with the criminal justice system [1].
A previous meta-analysis (from 2012) was designed with the aim of establishing an evidence base for interventions to redirect young offenders away from the formal justice system (not run exclusively by law enforcement agencies). To this end, the authors carried out a meta-analysis of studies evaluating juvenile redirection programs (with 28 experimental and quasi-experimental studies). According to the results of this meta-analysis, the effect of redirection programs on recidivism was generally not significant. Only the family and restorative justice treatment led to a statistically significant reduction in recidivism [2].

Bibliography

[1] Wilson, D. B., Brennan, I., Olaghere, A. (2018). Police‐initiated diversion for youth to prevent future delinquent behavior: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–88. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.5

[2] Schwalbe, C. S., Gearing, R. E., MacKenzie, M. J., Brewer, K. B., Ibrahim, R. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us