Axis
Problems addressed

Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Firearms-Focused Policing aims to reduce armed violence and crimes committed with firearms by means of strategies aimed at restricting firearm manufacturing and sales, interrupting the illegal supply of firearms, discouraging possession, reducing firearm carrying in public places, toughening responses to the illegal use of firearms, reducing the demand for firearms, promoting responsible possession, and addressing the community conditions that foster firearms crime.
Those strategies can be implemented by a single police agency or in an integrated manner among ostensible policing, investigative policing, forensics, and intelligence units that act both on groups specializing in gun theft and on people at a high risk of armed violence.
This type of intervention increases integration among different police agencies and contributes to the implementation of saturation strategies in micro-territories where there is a large circulation of people with illegal weapons.

Country of application
  • United States
  • Brazil
Evidence

A systematic review by the Campbell Collaboration evaluated the impact of seven police action strategies focused on the seizure of illegal firearms. The actions were carried out in the cities of Kansas, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh (USA), as well as Cali and Bogotá (Colombia). A reduction in homicide rates was observed in six of the seven tests evaluated. In Pittsburgh, there was a 34% reduction in calls regarding shootings and a 71% reduction in calls involving firearm injuries. In Kansas City, there was a 29% reduction in homicides, whereas in Bogotá and Medellín, there was a 10% to 15% reduction in homicides [1].
However, the authors of the systematic review report that those conclusions need to be relativized and that caution should be exercised when generalizing those findings due to the small number of studies, the variability in the design of the studies, and the analytical strategies adopted, the previous differences between the areas of intervention and comparison, and the scarcity of data on factors such as the quality of implementation, the spatial displacement of offences, and the long-term impact.

Bibliography

[1] Koper, C. S., Mayo‐Wilson, E. (2012). Police strategies to reduce illegal possession and carrying of firearms: Effects on gun crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.11

Information Source

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us