Axis

Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Policing Focused on Disorder and Disturbance of Peace is based on the “broken windows“ theory, according to which a disorder is a precursor to more serious crimes, fear of crime, and neighborhood decay [1]. This policing strategy had as its starting point the experience of New York (USA) in the 1990s, when the city’s police began to implement this strategy along with a series of organizational changes.
Disorder Policing can be applied through two main tactics: in conjunction with community policing and troubleshooting-oriented policing, or through zero tolerance strategies.
In the first case, the intervention is aimed at proactive police actions, which, based on a detailed diagnosis, define priority actions, focusing on petty crime and disorder, such as disturbance of the peace.
In the case of zero tolerance, the police tries to impose order through “tougher“ policing (application of administrative sanctions, arrests for minor offenses and misdemeanors, short-term detentions, interdiction of commercial premises, fines, etc.).
The characteristic that unites those two tactics is their focus on reducing (material and social) community disorder, understood as an instrument for preventing and/or reducing crime.

Country of application
  • United States
Evidence

A systematic review by the Campbell Collaboration found 28 impact evaluations on Policing Focused on Disorder and Disturbance of Peace, nine of which were experimental studies. According to the authors, this type of intervention is effective to reduce crime. The effect found is modest and statistically significant for crime in general, property crime, violent crime, and disorder [2]. Similarly, a modest but statistically significant effect was found for the case of diffusion of the intervention (decrease in crime in adjacent areas).
The tactic combined with Problem-Oriented Community Policing has an effect whose magnitude is five times greater (more effective to reduce crime) than that associated with the “zero tolerance“ tactic, whose coefficient is not significant.
In a previous study, the same authors had already warned about the relevance of the form/tactic adopted to implement the strategy because, when applied through aggressive policing strategies (zero tolerance), the interventions do not generate significant reductions in crime, whereas, when applied through Problem-Oriented Community Policing approaches, they do [3].
The Crime Solutions Portal has evaluated this latest systematic review, classifying the strategy as effective to reduce crime and general and potential delinquency to reduce property crime, violent crime, and alcohol- and drug-related crime.

Bibliography

[1] Wilson, J. Q., Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken Windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304….

[2] Braga, A. A., Welsh, B. C., & Schnell, C. (2019). Disorder policing to reduce crime: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(3). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1050

[3] Braga, A. A., Welsh, B. C., Schnell, C. (2015). Can Policing Disorder Reduce Crime? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(4), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815576576

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us