Problems addressed

Effectiveness

Promising

.

.

.

.

.

Promising

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Women’s primary reasons for involvement with crime are mostly a combination of gender-based trauma and violence, substance use disorders, mental disorders, and poverty. Despite the fact that women’s characteristics, life circumstances, and needs vary significantly from those of men, criminal justice policies and practices are still overwhelmingly based on models geared toward responding to male risks and needs. In addition, women are at greater risk of violence while under arrest and after incarceration. Studies globally emphasize the need for community-based alternatives and solutions designed with gender specificities in mind.
So-called gender-oriented interventions consist of treatment programs designed specifically for incarcerated women that aim primarily to reduce recidivism rates by addressing the physical and psychological health and well-being of those women, and may involve substance abuse treatment programs (including therapeutic communities) and the use of cognitive behavioral therapy approaches.

Country of application
  • United States
Evidence

One review examined the results of six studies on interventions for incarcerated women that followed the risk reduction model (which included substance abuse interventions) and found that women who received treatment were 45% less likely to recidivate [1].
Another meta-analysis examined 37 studies (involving 22,000 female offenders) to identify whether interventions delivered in correctional settings had an effect in terms of reducing recidivism, and whether gender-designed or neutral interventions differed in their effectiveness [2]. The findings suggest that gender-oriented interventions were significantly more likely to be associated with reductions in recidivism. The findings of this meta-analysis also indicate that women and girls are more likely to respond better to gender-oriented approaches if their criminal backgrounds and trajectories are associated with gender issues.

Bibliography

[1] Tripodi, S. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Kim, J. S., Bender, K. (2011). Effects of Correctional-Based Programs for Female Inmates: A Systematic Review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509352337

[2] Gobeil, R., Blanchette, K., Stewart, L. (2016). A Meta-Analytic Review of Correctional Interventions for Women Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815621100

Information Source

Evaluated cases

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us