Problems addressed

Effectiveness

Mixed Evidence

.

.

.

.

.

Mixed Evidence

¿Quieres saber más acerca de esta clasificación? Consulte nuestro manual metodológico.

Description

Multicomponent programs for highly violent youth include different interventions that can be applied in a closed setting or in the community. They may include cognitive behavioral therapies, treatments to reduce drug use, vocational training and employability, and social and family programs. It is a comprehensive strategy, as it also involves the family and the network of friends closest to the young people participating in the program, thus contributing to strengthen the social, family, and community bonds.

Country of application
  • Chile
  • United States
  • Sweden
Evidence

A systematic review by the Campbell Collaboration identified 30 studies that evaluated the impact of resocialization programs for male youth aged 12-21 years with a history of involvement in crime [1]. The interventions applied behavioral therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and educational strategies. The overall evaluation of the programs revealed an average 6% reduction in recidivism.
However, another systematic review with a meta-analysis evaluated 30 reintegration support programs for young offenders and reported mixed evidence for this type of program. Although some of the studies covered by this review identified successful experiences in terms of reducing recidivism among young offenders, the impact recorded was not statistically significant overall. Moreover, according to the Crime Reduction Toolkit platform, the effect varies according to the form of quantification used. When recidivism was measured through contact with law enforcement (re-arrest records, for example), young people who participated in the programs showed significantly lower levels of recidivism than non-participants. However, this was not the result found in those studies in which recidivism was measured through self-reports or court cases. Therefore, the aforementioned platform classifies the evidence from these interventions as “mixed” [2].
The Crime Solutions platform includes, in addition to this review, two others that found small but statistically significant impacts on recidivism [3] [4]. In light of this, this platform classifies these interventions as promising.

Bibliography

[1] Garrido, V., and Morales, L. A. (2007). Serious (Violent or Chronic) Juvenile Offenders: A Systematic Review of Treatment Effectiveness in Secure Corrections. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2007.7

[2] Weaver, R. D., and Campbell, D. (2015). Fresh Start. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514521302

[3] Chrissy J., Jan, G., Stams, J.M., Asscher, J. J., De R., Anne K., Van der Laan, P. H. (2013). Aftercare Programs for Reducing Recidivism Among Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Review. Clinical Psychology Review 33: 263–74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23313763/

[4] Bouchard, J., and Wong, J. S. (2018). Examining the Effects of Intensive Supervision and Aftercare Programs for At-Risk Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(2): 1509–34. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0306624X17690449

Evaluated cases

Functional Family Therapy

Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT)

Methodist Home for Children's Value-Based Therapeutic Environment (VBTE) Model

Multisystemic Therapy for Youth With Problem Sexual Behaviors (MST-PSB)

Multifunctional Treatment in Residential and Community Settings (MultifunC)

Culturally Informed and Flexible Family-Based Treatment for Adolescents (CIFFTA)

Why might the cases evaluated have different levels of effectiveness in relation to their respective type of solution?
Click here to understand why.

Some cases were not included in the evidence bank due to deficiencies detected in the methodology of their impact evaluations.
Click here to see the list

 

Image
flag

Send us your study!

Have you participated in impact evaluation studies of interventions to prevent crime, violence or disorder? Send us your study. It will be evaluated and may be included in the Evidence Bank!

Contact us